[concurrency-interest] Atomic arrays and toArray(), stream(), iterator()
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Mon Apr 24 01:50:07 EDT 2017
correction to avoid to spread false news,
i say that Arrayish was scheduled for 11 but i was wrong, it's part of valhalla and currently unscheduled.
> De: "Martin Buchholz" <martinrb at google.com>
> À: "jbloch" <jbloch at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Mike Duigou" <openjdk at duigou.org>, "Concurrency Interest"
> <concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu>
> Envoyé: Mardi 21 Mars 2017 00:49:31
> Objet: Re: [concurrency-interest] Atomic arrays and toArray(), stream(),
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Joshua Bloch < jbloch at gmail.com > wrote:
>> That's what I assumed, but I'll give Martin a chance to respond :)
> I was waiting for Doug or Aleksey to respond!
> The biggest advantage of AtomicLong will always be PORTABILITY. Each platform
> iteration takes more years to become ubiquitous than its predecessor, and that
> will be even more true for jdk9. VarHandles are for classes that are part of
> the platform or that value extreme performance more than portability.
> OTOH jdk9 AtomicLong is a wrapper around VarHandle. It's unlikely to be
> completely free. .... oh I now see Remi has a better answer!
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest