[concurrency-interest] AtomicReference.updateAndGet() mandatory updating

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Tue May 30 09:24:35 EDT 2017

On 30/05/17 10:12, Alex Otenko wrote:

> So my big question is: can a strong CAS detect the presence of an
> interleaving store without synchronizing-with it?

Surely yes: what if the interleaving store is not a volatile store?
I may be misunderstanding the question.

Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list