February 19, 2001
There were no new readings for this class.
The outline for the class is:
- Announcements
- Questions
- Assignment #3 discussion
- Sapir-Whorf
- Linguistic Relativity: cultural differences in cognition are correlated with
linguistics differences between cultures.
Linguistic Determinism: cultural differences in cognition are determined
by differences in languages.
- What kinds of linguistic facts are being refered to? Lexical (a term
for a specific concept) or Grammatical (concept embodied in an obligatory
grammatical distinction).
- With what kinds of phenomena is the connection being made? Whorf most
interested in relating lexicon and grammar to the total world view of a culture.
- What is the nature of the connection? Causal? If so is the linguistic
or the non-linguistic the causal factor? Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, two types:
- Strong Form: language determines thought and behavior patterns; language is
a mold for thought and philosophy.
- Weak Form: certain aspects of language can predispose people to think or
act in one way rather than another; language is a guide to thought.
- Codability influences judgement and memory: More easily coded colors
(focal) are better remembered. Comparative judgements are affected by
color names: given 3 color chips, pick the 'odd' color.
Kay & Kempton '84: where no linguistic code exists, wavelength
(perception) governs. Where there are linguistic labels, the
label matters.
(see color vision
for examples of color perception)
- at lexical level, lots of differences: easy to find language which has a
word for which there is no one-word equivalent in another language; languages
differ in providing superordinate terms for categories (Chinese has a superordinate term somewhat equivalent to "fruit and nuts"); semantic domain divided variously (color terms, geometric shapes.
- at grammatical level, grammatical categories of language covertly
bring us to pay attention to different attributes of situations (du v. sie in German, tu v. vous in French, coupled with obligatory verb conjunction forces the speaker to take note of the relation - status and intimacy - with the hearer).
Another example: part of speech v. semantic implications of that category. Indoeuropean "heat" is a noun, a thing (phlogiston) whereas in Hopi heat is a verb (a kinetic theory). Of course, western scientists did eventually arrive at a kinetic theory. In psychology there are many nouns (mind) that promote a search for things rather than processes or dynamics.
- Carroll and Casagrande studies
- Sapir says there are few concepts universally embodied in grammatical
structures; concepts might be awkwardly expressed in a language but always
can be expressed. So, what effects do these differences have on the way a
person thinks? Alternatively, the modes of dealing with the world might be
independent of language, communicating something that exists prior to its
codification in a language.
- Need to find a correlation between a linguistic phenomenon and a
nonlinguistic response. Nonlinguistic means they are neutral with respect
to the special symbol systems against which they are tested.
- Experiment I: discard 'odd' picture of three and decide which two best "go together." Subjects are either
native Hopi speakers or native English speakers (rural and grad students).
GROUP | Hopi response | English response | Neutral |
Hopi adults | 8 | 4 | 2 |
Rural Anglos | 6 | 4 | 2 |
Grad students | 4 | 11 | 1 |
- Experiment II: match one of two options to "standard". Subjects are
Navaho-dominant speaking Navaho, English-dominant Navaho, and a non-matched
group of children (caucasian) from Boston. Variants were shape, size, and color.
| Navaho-dominant Navahos | English-dominant Navahos | White Boston children |
Age | N | percent | N | percent | N | percent |
3,4 | 14 | 64 | 7 | 33 | 8,10 | 45,69 |
5 | 13 | 57 | 9 | 38 | 10 | 91 |
6 | 12 | 64 | 5 | 34 | 8 | 93 |
7 | 9 | 71 | 9 | 36 | 4 | 100 |
8 | 6 | 74 | 5 | 45 | 5 | 83 |
9,10 | 5 | 81 | 8 | 75 | 2 | 93 |
- Examination #1
Digressions/Miscellaneous
Overhead Notes
Parting Thoughts
Self-test Questions
| Links Page | 310 Home Page | Psychology Department | SUNY Oswego |
Comments to author: David Bozak
All contents copyright © 2001, SUNY Oswego, All rights reserved.
Revised: February 19, 2001
URL: http://www.cs.oswego.edu/~dab/310/classes/021901.html