Announcements
- PS#13 is an optional problem set; if you score higher on this problem set than your lowest score on PS#1-#12 then that lower score will be replaced in the configuration of your grade. PS#13 is due on Friday, May 6.
- Also due on Friday, May 6 is the final draft of your article review.
- PS#12 rewrites are not due until Friday, May 13 at the final exam. If you turn them in earlier, you can get the graded rewrites (along with your originals) back before the exam.
- Our final exam will be on Friday, May 13 at 8 am in our regular classroom. It's basically like two exams, one on the new material since Exam #2 and one on the "highlights" and important concepts and skills from the semester.
- Textbook: Real Analysis by Gary Towsley. This textbook is freely available for download as a pdf and can also be purchased bound from Amazon's Print-on-Demand service for $7.99 plus tax and shipping.
Deadlines and Due Dates
- Fri., May 6 - PS #13 (optional) and PS #11 rewrites, Article Review
- Fri., May 13 - PS #12 rewrites, Final Exam (8 - 10)
Getting in touch with your instructor...
- Email: I actually read and respond to emails. I check email frequently during the workday but limit my email time after work hours and on weekends. Please be patient, but if I don't reply by the end of the next working day then feel free to email me again – there's always a chance your first email got buried under urgent emails (or spam ...) and I appreciate the nudge!
- Office Hours: Just stop by! You don't need an appointment to drop by my office. If you want to meet over Zoom, you will need to make and keep an appointment, because I am uncomfortable sitting on Zoom with no one there. I am also available over Discord (username in the syllabus, behind the SUNY Oswego login...). Join the Math Club Discord server (link in syllabus) and send me a message! We can use the voice channels and the text channels to stay in contact. Just be aware that if you message me in Discord outside of office hours, I won't respond until office hours or until I'm free.
- Other times: If my office door is open then you are welcome to stop in and ask if I'm available. I may be! If I'm busy, we can make an appointment to meet up later on.
Analysis Article Review
This semester you will read a math article about analysis and write a review of that article. Your review will count for 10% of your overall course grade. There are many steps to this process and it's best to begin early. Here is a list of the deadlines for the different parts of the review assignment:
Deadlines!
- Zeroth Draft (10%): Friday, February 11
- Rough Draft (10%): Friday, April 22
- Final Version (80%): Friday, May 6
Where can you find suitable articles?
There are MANY places! Mathematics Magazine and the College Math Journal are good places to get started. Use Penfield Library's website to go to the database JSTOR, where you can browse both of these journals and download pdfs of the articles. There are many other journals out there with articles written for teachers, undergraduates, and math aficionado's ... you'll have to do like every other researcher and wade through materials to find the right article for you. I've collected many potentially suitable articles and put them in a folder in course materials folder.
What makes an article suitable?
The goal is for you to learn new analysis-related mathematics that you wouldn't necessarily see in the classroom and to explain what you've learned to your classmates. Don't try to find an article where you already know everything – after reading your Zeroth Draft, I'll ask you to find a new article anyway! If you find something interesting but aren't sure that it's suitable, show it to me and I'll let you know.
Zeroth Draft
Turn in either a hard copy or an electronic version of the article you intend to review, marked up with the following:
- Draw a line in the paper where you no longer understand what's being discussed.
- Underline every new word in the paper, even those that are past the "line of understanding".
- Highlight or underline the sentences you think are telling you the most important results or ideas of the paper.
You should also include a 1/2 - 1 page plan detailing the steps you will take to learn the new vocabulary and extend your understanding of the article. If the article is too short, too long, too easy, too hard, etc. then I'll ask you to find another article and submit a new Zeroth Draft (no grade penalty).
It's ok to change articles after this point but you will have to submit a new Zeroth Draft for the new article. You cannot change articles any later than 2 weeks before the first draft is due.
Rough Draft and Final Draft
These drafts must be submitted electronically as a PDF, made using latex. You may want to use the latex template provided in the course materials folder, but it is not required that you use the template.
Your review should consist of 1 - 2 pages summarizing the main ideas of the article as well as up to one page response. Throughout the review, keep in mind that your audience is other students in Math 347: Analysis A. By reading this article you have learned all sorts of new mathematics with which your peers are likely unfamiliar. Write in such a way that your colleagues can understand what you're saying!
For the summary portion, you should include:
- the main goal of the authors for the article,
- important theorems or examples,
- any special techniques or new ideas on which the article sheds light, and
- anything that you found particularly interesting.
Tips and reminders for your review:
- The title and author(s) of the article you read should be mentioned clearly at the start of the review.
- During the review, refer to the author(s) as "the author(s)" but also switch things up – use their names once in a while, too.
- Learning new mathematics is not easy and in this case you are doing it independently. That can be pretty lonely. Talk to your classmates about the new ideas you're learning and try to explain it to them -- this will help you when you write your draft AND maybe they can help you to understand the mathematics, too.
- Don't be afraid to come to me – I may be able to help unravel what's happening in the article. Be patient; it takes me some time to read and understand, too!
- You don't have to understand EVERYTHING in a crystal-clear fashion. While that would be wonderful, most of the time it's only necessary to see the main ideas and techniques, and understand most of the article.
- Look up some of the references. There may be better introductions (or better articles to review!) in the references.
- This is an essay – you need an introduction, a thesis statement, a conclusion, and proper citations for your references. Sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and exposition all matter!
- For an idea of the format I expect, check out the latex template.
Grading
Zeroth Draft – All directions should be followed. This will be graded on a +/0/- scale where + indicates that the assignment was completed in a more than satisfactory way, 0 indicates that the assignment was completed as directed, and - indicates that the assignment was not completed in a satisfactory way. In the latter case, the assignment must be turned in again with the missing details added.
Rough Draft – The rough draft will be graded on the same scale as the Zeroth Draft. Not all of the mathematics needs to be perfect and there may be errors in the writing. What matters is that the draft should clearly demonstrate the student's attempt to understand and parse the article, and convey that understanding to others.
Final Draft – The final draft of the review will be graded on the standard letter scale (A/A-/B+/...). Significant improvement should be made even if the improvement was not explicitly directed in the feedback from the first draft. Here, the mathematics, grammar, spelling, etc. must all be correct but also, the ideas of the article should be made clear to the reader.
Poster Project
This semester you and a partner will make a scientific poster describing the life and mathematical accomplishments of an analyst, or a place/time that is special in the development of analysis, or a monumental result in the field. This poster will be presented at Quest, on Wednesday April 1.
Who created the calculus material that we study today? How was this material developed and organized? What are the big results that really matter? Understanding mathematicians and their lives will help you understand how mathematics develops, as a field, and will help you to see that mathematics is still developing today. Studying how analysis has developed, and where, helps you to find your place in this big, welcoming field.
Deadlines!
- Rough Draft (10%): Friday, March 5
- Poster (90%): Wednesday, April 6 – Quest!
Who? What? Where?
Don't choose to do your poster on: Newton, Euler, Euclid, Einstein. Broaden your horizons. There are many, many others who you could study, such as: Emile Borel, Henri Lebesgue, Mary Cartwright, Stefan Banach, Colin Maclaurin, Brook Taylor, Joseph Louis Lagrange, Joseph Fourier, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Karl Weierstrass, Sofia Kovalevskaya, Maria Gaetana Agnesi, ... Plus, you can choose a place and time OR you could choose a famous theorem. Once topics are chosen, I'll post who's doing what here so that no two posters will be on the same thing.
While Wikipedia is a good place to get started, so is the MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive. The important this is that you cannot stop at either of these websites. You MUST go to the sources cited by these resources and get the information from the original sources or sources CLOSE to the original sources. Keep track of all of your resources so that you can properly cite them on the poster. Even figures and images must be cited, even if they are from Creative Commons.
What should be on the poster?
Your poster must include math! This may require that you:
- define vocabulary words,
- give examples or counterexamples,
- direct the reader to more detailed sources such as articles or books, or
- state results using correct, formal notation.
Your poster must obey the rules of grammar, use punctuation correctly, use correct spelling, and be well-written.
Your poster must obey the conventions of mathematical communication, including correct use of symbols and language.
Your poster should...
- have several different sections (dictated by the topic you choose),
- be written for an audience who has taken or is currently in MAT 215,
- contain correct information,
- list complete citation info, cited in a reasonable format (APA, MLA, bibtex plain style),
- use fonts and font sizes that are readable from a distance of 2-3 feet,
- have all text typed, even the mathematics,
- minimize blank space,
- be colorful and eye-catching, and
- be interesting to read.
Poster Draft
You must submit a rough draft of your poster before the poster session. Posters have different sections -- Introduction, Context, History, References, First Attempts, and so on. Every topic is different and will have different information available and a different history, so the posters may have different section titles. Be creative. FILL your poster with relevant information and make your poster visually appealing.
For the draft, each section should be typeset and the sections will be turned in, along with a sketch of how the sections will be laid out on the poster. You will need a poster title, and a short introduction/abstract that describes the point of the poster. Traditionally, this would be called an abstract, but because this is a poster that you will be presenting to living humans, you don't want to give away all of the surprises in the poster but you do want to entice people to read the poster, to care about what you've got on the poster. The introduction/abstract should be inviting and engaging!
Practical Concerns
How will you physically make a poster? There are two possibilities.
- Purchase a 48" x 36" tri-fold poster board (details are forthcoming, I will have some available for you and they'll cost around $3-$4). Latex/Typeset your different sections and print them out. Cut the different sections out, back them with colored paper (available in the Commons), and attach the paper to your poster board.
- Pay $30 to print out a large poster that was created using Microsoft PowerPoint or a poster template in latex. I recommend the latter, since latex has an easy poster document class. An example is available on the latex resources site.
References
You may use the internet to help you get started. Websites such as Wikipedia articles often can give pretty good explanations. You must, however, turn to peer-reviewed sources for additional information. Look in the references listed at the bottom of a Wikipedia article. Look for textbooks and journal articles. There are books entirely about unsolved problems and famous conjectures! Student class papers posted on the internet do not count as peer-reviewed sources.
Be sure to cite your sources in a proper format. Acceptable formats include MLA, APA, and the bibtex plain style.
Some Possible Sections for Your Poster
- Publications: Try a MathSciNet search of the papers published by your mathematician. Click on the Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet) link on the Penfield Library webpage that lists subscribed databases. If you are off-campus, you will be prompted to log in with your LakerNetID and password. Note that MathSciNet does not keep a list of publications by mathematicians from centuries ago so your mathematician may not be listed. If there is an entry for your mathematician then you'll likely find a nice list of publications ... it'll save you a more tedious literature search.
- Major Results: List the "big theorems" the mathematician is known for or his/her other lasting contributions.
- Descendants and Ancestors: Go to the Math Genealogy Page and find out who was your mathematician's PhD advisor ("Math Father") and other ancestors. Also, get a list of your mathematician's PhD students ("descendants").
- Life and Times: Give the basic biographical facts about when and where your mathematician was born, grew up, lived, and died. Where did he/she work? Was he/she a professor? A tutor? A nobleman or noblewoman? Did he/she marry? Have children? Come from a mathematical family? Have mathematician children? Live during troubled times? Survive a war? Make your mathematician seem like the real human being he/she was!
Writing Tips
Writing mathematics well is not as easy as it first seems. Many established mathematicians are poor writers, but even good writers struggle to improve their writing skills every time they write. You can read more about the expectations of good writing in mathematics by checking out this article: A Guide to Writing Mathematics by Dr. Kevin P. Lee. We'll talk about my specific expectations as we work through the semester, but please know that you are always welcome to ask and you will be given options to rewrite and improve your work. We all have room to improve our writing!
Your Writing Assignment grade will be based on (1) typesetting and (2) good writing skills. There will be a separate grade for mathematical correctness. Sometimes people write well but don't actually do the assignment ... other times people can get the right answer but explain it poorly. That's why the grades are separated. Questions? Come talk with me!
Getting Started with LaTeX
There are many online and free ways to access latex, including Overleaf, CoCalc, LatexBase, Papeeria, Authorea, ... Each one is different. There are also the editors/compilers that you can download and install on your own machine (such as MiKTeX and MacTeX for compilers, and editors like TeXworks). Stop by office hours if you want some assistance in getting started.
Latex Figures and References
The article review template has examples of one way to do references in latex. The template requires that you type in all of the bibliographic information for each reference item (bibitem) individually and format the entry yourself. It's not that bad if you have only one source to cite. On the other hand, if you are citing several sources (either in the review article or the poster) then you may be interested in learning how to use bibtex. People love bibtex. The formatting is automatic! It's so straightforward!
To refer to a bibitem in your latex document, use the command \cite{key}. Each source has its own identifier, or key. When you type \cite{key} then the after a few compiles, the compiler realizes where the bibliographic info is, how many sources there are, numbers them, and then a little [#] will appear in your pdf with the correct number. The simplicity and automation are heavenly.
To get a figure into latex, first make sure the picture file is a png or jpg. Other types of files will work, but the coding is a bit more complicated. Screenshots tend to be png files so if your file is not a jpg or png already, we can get your figure into a workable format in no time. Then make sure the picture file is in the same folder as your .tex file. Use this code for pngs:
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\caption{Put your caption here.}\label{key}
\includegraphics[scale=1]{filename}
\end{figure}
Replace "filename'' with the actual name of your picture file. For instance, if the picture is tulips.png then type in "tulips". Also change the work "key" to something that uniquely identifies this figure, for instance "tulips''. When you refer to the figure, you can type "Figure~\ref{key}" and the number will automatically show up. It's awesome! If the png is too large or small, you can change the number that the scale is set at as appropriate.
For a jpg use the code:
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\caption{Put your caption here.}\label{key}
\includegraphics[width=4in]{filename}
\end{figure}
Here, you need to set the width of the picture to the appropriate number of inches. You can use centimeters, instead, if you prefer.
Questions? Confused? Worried? Well, come to office hours or send me your .tex file!!
LaTeX Fun
You can exchange the commands in the box below for your own and render it on demand. It's kind of fun! Press the Render! button when you're ready.
\({}\)