[concurrency-interest] Quest for the optimal queue
nathan.reynolds at oracle.com
Fri May 11 13:55:46 EDT 2012
I've heard of disruptor and they have some results comparing it against
http://code.google.com/p/disruptor/wiki/PerformanceResults I don't know
how it would compare against ConcurrentLinkedQueue.
Consulting Member of Technical Staff | 602.333.9091
Oracle PSR Engineering <http://psr.us.oracle.com/> | Server Technology
On 5/11/2012 8:00 AM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I'd like to explore alternatives to ConcurrentLinkedQueue, especially
> to get a bit lower latency and perhaps even lower mem usage.
> No locks
> Single consumer
> Multiple producers
> numberOfMessages // Would be nice to have as a constant, can be linear
> or simply not supported, doesn't really matter
> hasMessages // Just a Boolean if there's anything in there at all,
> only needs to return true if something has been put in that hasn't
> been pulled out yet
> Is there anything out there which is better than CLQ?
> Viktor Klang
> Akka Tech Lead
> Typesafe <http://www.typesafe.com/>- The software stack for
> applications that scale
> Twitter: @viktorklang
> Concurrency-interest mailing list
> Concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Concurrency-interest