[concurrency-interest] Future.isCompletedNormally Future.isCompletedAbnormally

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Thu Mar 5 00:25:53 EST 2015

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:56 PM, <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a similar complaint as Viktor. These default implementations seem
> too heavyweight.

Most concrete implementations will sprout efficient implementations. And
the cost of the default implementations is "only" an exception throw/catch,
and that only when the future failed, which is supposed to be rare.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/attachments/20150304/4e9bb687/attachment.html>

More information about the Concurrency-interest mailing list